<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Comments for entry "Context Is Everything" at Dilbert.com Blog]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/110]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Regular thoughts and updates from Dilbert.com]]></description>
<language><![CDATA[en-us]]></language>
<generator><![CDATA[VPI.Net MyBlogAbout]]></generator>
<managingEditor><![CDATA[]]></managingEditor>
<webMaster><![CDATA[]]></webMaster>
<ttl><![CDATA[5]]></ttl>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Stomper]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10863]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I agree that Bay of Pigs is an example of a presidential mistake due to lack of experience.  There have probably been others, but most cannot be distinguished from other causes excluded by Scott-- stupidity, etc.  Most mistakes have more than one cause.

Nevertheless, Scott's basic point is still accurate:  Bay of Pigs was the only obvious example in the last 50 years.  Experience is not a critical criteria.

I am frightened and appalled by candidates for &quot;Leader of the Free World&quot; who will disregard facts that conflict with their idealogy.  That's what we've had for the last 8 years, and that is what Pres. Palin would give us as well.

Odds of McCain's death are irrelevant.  Her only job is to be there in case he dies.  Her qualifications only becaome relevant upon his death.  Logically, she MUST be evaluated on the assumption that McCain will die in office -- otherwise, she is irrelevant.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10863]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from hyperactivex]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10728]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[There are two levels here - level one is elections, level two is running the country. Similar to passing your graduation exams and having a career. One leads to the other, but if your focus is only on the first and not on the second then you're in trouble. 

I think the choice of Palin was brilliant from the point of view of level one i.e. winning the elections / passing the exam. I'm not saying this guarantees victory, but it certainly brings them from way back in the race to serious contender. However, I think she's a bad choice from the point of view of level two i.e. running the country.

In short - a good move, till it proves to be a bad one!]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[TuePMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10728]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from ChronicleTiger]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10578]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed, Mr. Adams, and I believe it to be spot on.  My favorite line was, &quot;It's politically correct to say voters are smart. But clearly there are millions of exceptions.&quot;... Nice!  Evidence for the veracity of your statement can be seen here in the comments!

From one side of Jell's mouth comes his expanded critique of McCain's foreign policy while his other side says he's no expert on foreign policy and is not basing his decision on foreign policy.  Huh?

Then there's Muppet who believes things like Patriotism, support the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution and Welfare Reform, among others, are indications of hate.  You're right Muppet, Welfare Reform is obviously an attack on the poor.  We all should instead support a system that perpetuates the very condition it is intended to dispel.  Makes sense to me!  While we're at it, let's provide free cigarettes to lung cancer sufferers.  At least they'll feel better, right?

Glad I was linked to this blog, I think I'll enjoy it.  To all those who have a well thought out reason for their vote, I applaud and thank you.  To all others, please stay home on November 4, 2008.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[MonAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10578]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from headhunt23]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10568]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[To Dal Tiger:

Thank you.  You are brilliant - you must be the smartest person on the face of the earth to have figured out the presidential succession procedure.  My, what a big brain you have.

Thank you for educating all of us ignorant rubes who thought if the President died, the VP for Direct Marketing at Publishers&quot; Clearing House would take over.

You sir, just took a load off my mind.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[MonAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10568]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from rd]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10539]]></link>
<description><![CDATA['Some voters prefer candidates who look like them, end of story.' 
very funny 
i've noticed the display only my comments button, that's also funny
i wish i could read all the comments just scrolling down as it was before in the old blog, not folded up as it is now]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[SunAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10539]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Dal_Tiger]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10424]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I think the point you are missing, and the one I hope that American voters don't miss, is that if anything happens to McCain, Palin will become President.  Surely she does not have enough experience to run the country, but as the founding fathers said, anyone can become president.  I think the only reason Bush wasn't assassinated long ago was that no one wanted Cheney to become President, although the shock of becoming President probably would have did him in.  As for Palin, I just have a problem with the fact that she is a religious nut, and a hypocrite to boot.  I mean, we all expect our politicians to lie to us, but I guess we are still shocked when they do it so blatently.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10424]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from poecooper]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10366]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[The first thought in my head when I saw McCain had picked Palin for VP was exactly:  BRILLIANT.

I am a registered Independant vegetarian whose favorite book is Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto.  But even I can see sheer brilliance when it occurs, even if orchestrated by the Republicans.

In my opinion, you are forgetting one very important marketing truth, and that is that beautiful women can get away with anything.  Human physical beauty is one of the most powerful forces of nature in the world.  You can't stop people from being drawn to physical beauty at the most basic, even genetic, levels.  

Throw in the surprise element, the POW war veteran element, and the way humans just love nastiness, you have basically the Houdini of campaign strategy.  And frankly, I am scared.  I think they actually might win now.

*shudder*]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10366]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from jell]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10362]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[The Republican slogan that irks me most is &quot;Country First&quot;, as if the interests of the USA are somehow less than foremost in the minds and plans of the Democrats.  (Or did they really want to write &quot;My country right or wrong&quot; but couldn't fit that many letters onto the signs?)]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10362]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from jell]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10361]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Treetrunk123 wrote: &quot;People align themselves with the Republican party for various reasons, but the top three are usually taxation, national security and wanting more limited government. If the Democratic Candidate has recently adopted the Republican view on these issues, I stand corrected.&quot;

Interesting.  If the Republicans truly stand for limited government and national security, they haven't done a very good job of it for the past 7.5 years.  The taxes to pay for the Iraq war alone -- a war of choice, not necessity -- belie any Republican claim to fiscal responsibility, and what do we have to show for it&quot;?  

McCain supports the war in Iraq, and that alone will keep me from voting Republican.  One could claim that attacking Iraq focussed the anger of the Islamists on a target -- our troops -- far away from the continental USA.  One could just as plausibly claim that it's made us _less_ safe by inciting antipathy to the USA.  The images of torture at Abu Ghraib must be a great recruiting tool.

But, you may be thinking, that's all in the past, and this election's about the future.  True!  What are the foreign policy challenges for the next president?  Nukes in Iran, N. Korea, Pakistan and probably Elbonia, too.  Ongoing insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan; unfortunately, the Taliban are making a comeback.  Oh, yeah, almost forgot: Russia (gulp).  What would Obama do to further American interests abroad?  I don't know, but then I don't claim to be an expert in geopolitics.  Fortunately, the Dems have a deep bench of potential nominees for Sec. of State and Defense, so I'm confident he'll at least be getting good advice and could hardly botch things worse than George W. Bush has.  I suspect a McCain presidency would also be a vast improvement over the Bush years, so I'm not really basing my vote on foreign policy.  (It's the economy, Einstein.)]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10361]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Muppet]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10356]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Picking Palin was just another reason to not vote for McCain. He picked her because those dirty old men wanted a reason not to pick Obama. Some Hillary supporters are disgusted that he would pick an anti-gay, anti-choice, anti-women, lipstick wearing bible thumper to represent them. She is no Hillary and until today, has repeated the same speech over and over. That's intelligent and experienced? 

I have to respond witth this list:
HATE a basic core value of the GOP...
&quot;Fiscal conservative&quot; = We hate government
&quot;Supply side economics&quot; = we hate taxes
&quot;Federal deficits&quot; = we hate our grandchildren
&quot;Patriotism&quot; = we hate the rest of the world
&quot;Financial deregulation&quot; = we hate borrowers
&quot;welfare reform&quot; = we hate poor people
&quot;tort reform&quot; = we hate injured people
&quot;Right to work&quot; laws = we hate unions
&quot;Roe v. Wade&quot; = we hate women
&quot;Protection of Marriage&quot; = we hate gays and lesbians
&quot;2nd Amendment protection&quot; = we hate gun violence victims
&quot;opposition to climate change legislation&quot; = we hate the earth
&quot;opposition to state regulation of air quality&quot; = we hate clean air (and states if they are blue)

Enough with the Hate!]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10356]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Treetrunk123]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10348]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Davey West, I want to respond to your claim that &quot;While I typically align myself Republican, I'm leaning towards Obama right now for one reason: No scandals.&quot; 

Did you forget about William Ayers and his affiliation with this unrepentant terrorist for twenty years? I guess it is not as important as what McCain had done in his youth. His current marriage had been under strain, and he had the opportunity to leave, but he did not. This is proof that  McCain has matured. 

I am the reluctant pro-choicer, but did you know that Sen. Barak Obama opposed legislation to protect viable babies who survived abortions? Of course that is not a scandal, because he proudly opposed it. 

I guess the closest thing to a secret scandal is the exposure of Rev. Jeremiah Wrong and his &quot;G-D America speech&quot;. That was a secret that this candidate claimed to not even know about.  

People align themselves with the Republican party for various reasons, but the top three are usually taxation, national security and wanting more limited government. If the Democratic Candidate has recently adopted the Republican view on these issues, I stand corrected. 

]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedPMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10348]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from daveywest]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10339]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Where do you really get the experience to be a great president?  Ronald Regan was an actor who knew how to handle the media.

John McCain is a veteran, but hardly a war hero like Washington, Grant or Roosevelt.

While I typically align myself Republican, I'm leaning towards Obama right now for one reason: No scandals.  

McCain got back from Vietnam and started fooling around on his crippled wife.  I don't think anyone would have blamed him for being forthright and saying, &quot;We've both changed.&quot;  But he let his pecker do his thinking for him.

A hot chick one heartbeat from moving into the White House might keep me more interested in politics (and visiting my brother who is actually a uniformed SS guard), but there are too many stories about back-stabbing, lying, undue influence and manipulation for someone with such a short public service record.

Maybe Obama hasn't been in politics long enough, but no one has found a mistress -- not that there aren't hundreds of willing applicants.  Biden is the poster boy for family values in the face of tragedy.

Arguably, the economy is the biggest issue facing most Americans, but no one can really say which plan or policy will &quot;fix&quot; things.  It's too complex.  We know what can break the economy (inflation, speculation, fraud), but we really don't know how to fix it.

Right now, Obama/Biden are the better choice for me because they have a morally better record.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedPMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10339]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Fire@will]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10320]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[In a few months, when we're talking about &quot;where the Senator lost the election&quot;, I think two of the most popular opinions will be &quot;when he picked his VP&quot;.  

PALIN/COMPARISON]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10320]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Phantom II]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10319]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Oh, sure you can.  Tell, I mean.  You're such a kidder.

It's somewhat amusing to me how your lefty friends can talk about a woman who has been in government for thirteen years and has been governor of her state (thus making her the only candidate of either party to have had executive experience) and call her &quot;inexperienced.&quot;  Then, they turn around to Obama, who was a community organizer, a state senator for a short time, and then a US Senator running for president from the day he hit office, and call him somehow experienced.  

So to the left, it's OK to be inexperienced if you're a charismatic and well-spoken presidential candidate, but if you are a charismatic and well-spoken woman running for vice-president with more experience than the other party's presidential candidate, it's somehow bad.

Let's face it: it was a great pick.  It solidified and energized the Republican base.  Donations are way up to the party; white women have had a twenty-point shift in their support, from eight percent in favor of Obama before the pick, to twelve percent for McCain after the pick.  The left is panicked, and they're bringing out every slur they can make up, with the willing help of the mainstream media.  I have already received three unsolicited e-mails from people I don't know telling me what a horrible person Sarah Palin is.  Our lefty buddies, who support women in office (as long as they're liberal), are scared stiff.  And they should be.

Their attacks on governor Palin are transparent, and they're having the opposite effect than what they intended.  The news that the Obama campaign sent a team of thirty lawyers and campaign people to Alaska to dig up dirt on Palin shows how desperate they are, and it's beginning to piss independents off and make them move to McCain.  The independents feel, quite rightly, that if the Obama campaign has to resort to this kind of tactic (which Obama said he would never do), then they are doing it because they will lose the debate on the issues big time.

And why did Obama pick Joe Biden?  Talk about &quot;Old Washington&quot; and status quo, not to mention the little matter of plagarism.  Everyone on the right knows he did it because he couldn't pick a woman unless he picked senator Clinton, and if he did that he'd have to hire a food taster.  

Obama's past associations are coming back to roost, with apologies to his good friend the Reverend Wright.  Bill Ayres, Father Pfleger, Tony Rezko, et. al. Compare all that to a mother of five who also is governor of her state.  Open the door, Dems, and your chickens will poop all over your head.  You support women in high positions, as long as they're liberal - Biden said it would be a step back for women if Palin got elected to Vice President.  Sure, Joe.  You tell 'em.

Ought to be a lot of fun to watch - but in any case, the Palin pick was a stroke of genius.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10319]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from fauna]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10303]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Who cares who is McCain's VP pick?
I have supported Democrats all my life. For the first time, I am supporting the Repubs. I really don't care who
McCain's VP pick is.

Was an Edwards supporter.
But Obama &amp; the Democratic insiders (Dean, Pelosi, Brazille) have totally alienated me from the Dems.

1) Obama gamed the caucuses 
http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/documents/2008_Caucus_injustices_FINAL.pdf
http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/documents/2008_Caucus_Injustices_part2_3-Jun-2008.pdf

2) Obama is good only in a prepared speech. He hmms &amp; haaws through a debate or an interview.

3) He doesn't have a stance on anything 
- he was against FISA before he was for it
- he was against guns before he was for it
- he was against Washington insiders before he selected Biden
- he voted &quot;present&quot; probabaly more than anyone else.

4) Rezko, Ayers, Rev Wright - enough said

5) He has gamed all elections in his life.
He threw his mentor Alice Palmer under the bus to get the Illionois Senate seat
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/04/once-obamas-men.html

6) Obama knew that the only way to become the nominee was get near 100% of
the black votes. That was pretty difficult - Bill &amp; Hillary were very popular with blacks.
Bill wasn't called the first black president for nothing. So how does Obama become
the nominee - simple - project Bill &amp; Hillary as racists.

7) Obama has probably run as dirty a primary campaign as Bush43 did in 2000.

8) Most people think 90% of Obama's money comes from small donors. This is
a very clever projection by his campaign which isn't true.
90% of the number of donors he has are small donors. But these 90% of small donors
contribute only around 50% of the total money collected by him. Around 1/2 his money
comes from big donors, just like any other politician.

9) Obama views on the death penalty are to the right of the supreme court.

10) Obama talks against lobbyists &amp; picks Joe Biden (D-MBNA) as his running mate.
Biden's son is a lobbyist. 

I could go on, for a few more pages, but I got work to do.

]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10303]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Dman]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10298]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Good OP Scott.
As has been said, there are some mistakes like bay of pigs that are due to lac of experience.

I think the way to spin this is that Obama picked the most qualified running mate who can offer him experienced based advice to consider when making decisions, whereas McCain picked someone to who looks good and will help win an election but who he will ignore once he is in office.

McCain's views are so different from Palin's no one should believe Palin will be doing much in office besides looking hot until McCain passes away.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10298]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from headhunt23]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10297]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Ammateur -

Good post.  I always find it amazing that the Democrats, who fancy themselves as being so smart always 
A) take the bait
B) continue to make the same mistakes

In reality - they are morons.

Palin gets nominated and they immediately set out trying to bimboize her and make her out to be some trailer trash fresh off a Springer Show apperance, they therefore succeed in lowering expectations and drive lots of people to watch her speech in hopes that she would come out in a mumu, curlers and smoking a cigarette.

Instead they saw an attractive woman delivering a speech very well and with a lot of wit and style.

Hey morons - thanks.  Calling Republicans idiots has worked so well for you over the last 28 years hasn't it?

What's really funny is that if you watch the talk shows, right wing pundits and operatives are always on them giving good advice that Democrats would do very well to heed.  While one would think that our side wouldn't be so free with the advice, we know it doesn't matter - Democrats are too arrogant and, yes, stupid to listen anyway.  Democrats would rather blissfuly take in the aroma while wallowing in the scent of their own farts than take a Republican candidate's threat seriously.

Hey dumbasses - Palin is a governor, and the first woman governor of a state that is majority male.  She was a former newscaster.  She sports 80% approval rating in her home state.  Isn't it more than possible that a person with that background and with demostratably good political skills would be able to give a good speech?  

One would think so, and one would try to set expectations accordingly - unless of course one was/is a moron, which the democrats are.

In closing, I'd just like to say thanks, morons.  Thanks for continuing to make the same mistake again and again and again.  Enjoy another 4 years of Republican rule.

Bwaahaaaaahaaaa]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10297]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from ammateur]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10295]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Scott

I couldn't wait till you would say something about Palin. well done, good analysis.

I agree with yours but think it is a LOT cleverer than that.

The GOP knew that the Dems (or if not them, then liberal media, bloggers who are perceived to represent them) would come out tearing her apart. They knew that actually the result of this would be to make her seem like a poor, victimised, abused (beautiful) woman who's just trying to keep it all together. Rather like most &quot;folks&quot;, in fact, except a little more attractive.

Even Obama recognised this, albit a little late, and begged his people to lay off her. But the damge was done, and anyway, he can't control every liberal journo and blogger.

The best strategy for the Dems (if they had real clever people running their campaigns, like the ppl who managed to get BUSH ELECTED - TWICE!!) WOULD have been a little counterintuitive - to all come out praising GOP, McCain, the Reps for picking a woman, for picking somone from a remote state, for being progressive, etc. Of course the praise should be a little patronising, and &quot;damn her with faint praise&quot;. but not a single word of criticism - not of her inexperience, views, problems, record - NOTHING but (mild) praise.

This would have made Dems seem magnanimous, and would have subtly communicated 2 things - first, that Palin is so rubbish the other side can be nice about her, second, that well done the GOP for picking a woman - EVEN MORE well done the Dems for picking someone black!

That would have worke for them, but Rove et al gambled, correctly as it turned out, that the Dems / liberals would find the gambit irresistible and got sucked into the trap.

I feel that most of the Dem strategists are idealists - bread and butter for the Rep realists.

One of the funny things is that i guess the Reps anonymously tipped off the liberals all the Palin scandals - just in case they wouldn't find them on their own! All part of the plan - and quite a brilliant plan, too. Working so far.

As things stood, as Scott points out, McCain was probably losing. Now the election, as well as being what Scott mentioned, is going to be a referendum on Sarah Palin - do we give her the thumbs up or the thumbs down? If you decide thumbs-up, THE ONLY WAY OF DOING THAT is by voting her ticket! It's the same phenomenon that drives ppl to phone premium-rate phone numbers on American Idol etc.

My last point is i think McCain also reasoned as followed; if i pick a regular VP, then th whole election is a referendum on Barack. If he can convince everyone he's American enough, patriotic enough, &quot;white&quot; enough, etc then he wins, if he can't convince everyone then he loses. What would that make McCain, even if he won? The white guy who just happened to be running against the black guy who lost because of the racists.

This way, if McCain wins or loses, it's on his own terms, he can say, it was my brilliant, unpredictable decisons that won it or lost it.

Thats how i read it

Love

ammateur



]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10295]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from odson]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10292]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Inexperienced? Like the Governor of a Podunk state such as Arkansas?  Before Slick Willie's gig grinding that state into the lower echelons of every category a state can lay claim to, his only other political resume item was running the McGovern campaign in Texas. Don't remember any Dems saying anything about inexperience back when he was the nominee]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10292]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from AajTak]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10291]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[If Dick Cheney can make it through his 8 years (fingers crossed), health condition should not be a factor in presidential campaign anymore !
Palin is of course a super hot entry, context or not. She looks like someone who would be working on Tony Soprano's pschotherapy sessions. If McCain wins this one, I can imagine how jealous Bill Clinton would get. He would be thinking &quot; I got Hillary for wife, Al for VP so I had to settle for Monica. This old bastad, has Cindy for wife, Palin for running mate. Next what, he will take in Angelina Jolie for his intern?&quot;
In mind, McCain is already a winner!
]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedAMPDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10291]]></guid>
</item>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedPMPSTE_Rstst]]></pubDate>
<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[WedPMPSTE_Rstst]]></lastBuildDate></channel></rss>
