<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Comments for entry "Wondering Who is Watching" at Dilbert.com Blog]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/112]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Regular thoughts and updates from Dilbert.com]]></description>
<language><![CDATA[en-us]]></language>
<generator><![CDATA[VPI.Net MyBlogAbout]]></generator>
<managingEditor><![CDATA[]]></managingEditor>
<webMaster><![CDATA[]]></webMaster>
<ttl><![CDATA[5]]></ttl>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Treetrunk123]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10616]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[There are only three logical outcomes to this survey. They favor McCain. They favor Obama. They are divided about which candidate is best for the economy. I don't see how so many people can be in &quot;suspense&quot; over this. What I'm really curious about will be the emotional response to this article. I can't wait to read all the posts after the survey.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[TueAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10616]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Hemantsclone]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10536]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Now whats this 'That's-my-line-Obama' about? 

Nuts man, nuts. Thats what the ancestors ate for gas. Its like a yawn. You pass, the next one passes and so on. Scott to Obama to Mcwhats-the-name to the voters...]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[SunAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10536]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Hemantsclone]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10535]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I knew just one name in that list of Top Ten! That was Scott.

Now who paid for this?]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[SunAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10535]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from jell]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10439]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Diebold &amp; company might be able to ensure a defective election, with no paper trail for post-election audits.  Electoral shenanigans -- they're what makes this country great.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10439]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from whallify]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10438]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I'd be ok if it afflicted voters.

Or AFLAC'ed voters.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10438]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from JASONJ]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10430]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Scott said:
&quot;I donâ€™t expect it to affect this election, but there is a non-zero chance it will change the type of information voters demand.&quot;

Ok, so you are not looking to AFFECT the election--how 'bout to EFFECT the election?

You ARE a professional writer--maybe you've got this one figured out  (affect/effect)...

]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10430]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Drowlord]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10423]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I can easily believe that you're one of the top 10 celebrity blogs.  How many other celebrities write an intelligent, often humorous, thought-provoking blog almost every single day.  You've made a real commitment to your blog, and it's only reasonable that people would recognize your excellence.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10423]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from sidewiiiiiinder]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10419]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Ahh come on. Its the same guy who comments on ur website has put on that top ten list webpage. :p]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10419]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from BobNL]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10415]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I admire your initiative and good will and all, but I feel I have to whine about 2 things regarding your survey:

- First of all, the premise that the economy is the most important issue for this election. That may be true, because that's what the voters say ... Is it therefore the most important issue for the country? In my opinion, a 'good country' has a functioning economy indeed, but other values are more important.

- Economy is no hard science. My daughter-in-law started studying economy last year after she broke off a study in bio-chemics. The university has a good reputation (Marburg). She says economics is a laugh. It is easy, and it has almost no ingredients of a 'hard' science. Nothing can be proven, it is a lot like social science. The only tough subject is stochastics.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10415]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from larryh77]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10412]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I have been anxiously awaiting your economists results for weeks now.  Can't wait until Monday.  But what are the chances we'll find your Monday post slanted towards your candidate of choice??

[I think both candidates are unfit. You will see that slant. -- Scott]]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10412]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from elsa]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10411]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[it may seems stupid to you...but i do print your blog entries as my english learning materials...]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10411]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from christie]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10408]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Re: your 'votes are stupid comment' - former Australian Prime Minister John Howard, when trying to 'reform' the country's industrial relations system:

'There is an inexorable historical process under
way..it will sweep away the insufferably
arrogant assumption made by the present
industrial relations system that men and
women in Australia are too stupid to be
trusted with the responsibility of deciding
what is good for them.â€™]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10408]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from jell]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10407]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[The comedic possibilities multiply if you think about multiple crazy stalkers pretending to be one person.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10407]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from daveywest]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10406]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I'm guessing the one crazy one is Rita Mae.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10406]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from cavpollo]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10405]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Normally i dont leave comments... it takes a while wo login and everything else... so I guess that Scott is right... and  Shyzaboy... and kls.... hahaha

maybe scott is his own stalker multi-aliased commenter... XD

anyway... it seems that most people focused on the &quot;no one ever reads my blog&quot; thing... so to follow the thread here is my excuse: it takes time to read thru some of the concepts, and posting a comment just will take me more time (like right now... ive spent 3 to 5 minutes...) and the fact that you (scott) are a celebrity, I dont think you would need a comment or 2 from me to help to build your ego everyday... you got more than enough when you percieve that someone on the other side of the world is alughing and/or thinking about what you wrote.

and by the way... sue Obama for using your &quot;Catch Phrase&quot;... or at lest  get him to put you on one of his commercials saying: &quot;I Scot Adams, approve this message&quot;... that would be pretty neat... hahaha]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10405]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from jcarkeys]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10404]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[You know you're important when you're ranked higher than the creator and the CEO of Google.

Too bad it doesn't have a cash payout.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10404]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from kbear7lucky]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10403]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[hi]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10403]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from kbear7lucky]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10402]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[When I get out of bed every morning and I go to High school myboyfriend always asks &quot;You ready for some English Albert Einstien&quot;]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10402]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Brian211]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10399]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Not only listed in the Top 10, but you are even listed higher than #10]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10399]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from NCResident]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10398]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[The study is intriguing.  Prior to hearing about this study, I presumed I knew what an economist was, but then I realized, I don't.  And if an important survey result is at stake, I think suddenly there will be a lot more debate over what an &quot;economist&quot; is.

It occurred to me, my company doesn't have a position called &quot;economist&quot;.  For one to be called an economist, presumably one works for, or did work for someone on the basis of the claim of being an economist.  So I am just as curious as to how you went about locating 500 &quot;economists&quot; and who they work for.

Personally, I'd enjoy sitting down talking to an economist who is knowledgeable about government insides and who I know is not trying to persuade me of how to vote.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/10398]]></guid>
</item>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedPMCSTE_Rstst]]></pubDate>
<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[WedPMCSTE_Rstst]]></lastBuildDate></channel></rss>
