<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Comments for entry "Gadolinium is Fun" at Dilbert.com Blog]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/44]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Regular thoughts and updates from Dilbert.com]]></description>
<language><![CDATA[en-us]]></language>
<generator><![CDATA[VPI.Net MyBlogAbout]]></generator>
<managingEditor><![CDATA[]]></managingEditor>
<webMaster><![CDATA[]]></webMaster>
<ttl><![CDATA[5]]></ttl>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from TallDave]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1928982]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[As someone who's been looking (and mostly laughing) at alt-energy for a long time, I can tell you this absolutely won't work as a generator (though it might move for some time).  There have been about a million attempts to build magnetic generators similar to this and they never, ever work (though some do attract impressive levels of funding from stupid people).  Magnetism doesn't work this way; it's a First Law problem.  

Here's why, in a nutshell: what you have is two gradients, one gravity and one magnetic.  Your proposed generator would harness energy by falling down one gradient, then the other.  The problem is, to move down in one gradient you have to also move up in the other, and &lt;i&gt;it always takes work to move up a gradient.&lt;/i&gt;  The 1LOT mandates that the energy required to re/demagnetize the gadolinium must always be more than what could be generated from the movement of the gadolinium.

It should be pointed out, btw, that building a &quot;nearly perpetual motion machine&quot; that &lt;i&gt;doesn't generate energy&lt;/i&gt; is trivial -- all you have to do is take some matter that has a nonzero temperature, and put it in an insulated box.  It will bounce around in there for quite a while (though 2LOT says not forever).

The one  &lt;i&gt;possible&lt;/i&gt; plausible exception I've run across is something called a Mach drive, which works on a similar principle - there are certain materials that seem to undergo a mass change under certain conditions, and this can be used (in theory) to generate thrust.  The critics argue this is a 1LOT violation because above certain efficiencies you could build a generator that way, the supporters argue there is no 1LOT violation because the Mach drive/generator borrows momentum from the causally connected universe.  There's a Dr. Paul March who has produced some interesting test results, I believe up to a milli-newton now, though replication is lacking.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1928982]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Golden]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1927585]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[In my recent research i found they have come up with a blend of other metels that allow gadolium to work at room temp a few google searches and you'll find it also it seems to be able to reach 80 degrees F I have been wondering about ways to use it to preheat water before it enters my on demand hot water heater]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1927585]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Tiajuana Gangsta]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/5014]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[IF gondolinium goes from non magnetic to magnetic at a specific temperature (the way water won't boil at 99.99 C* but will at 100C*) then theoretically you can use friction to produce the minute increase in temperature needed while the correct outside temp would balance the heat produced (Gondolium would change temperature as little as possible for best efficiency).  This almost seems plausable but i don't believe in perpetual motion so somebody tell me what's wrong with it?]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriPMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/5014]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from anonmark]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/4307]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Being totally lazy and not wanting to do any real research, I have to ask the question: why do we need it to be in a place near  room temperature? Why not northern Canada or Siberia?

Regardless of how quickly the gadolinium heats up,  it should not need to heat the entire area to lose its magnetic properties, only itself and a small &quot;orbit&quot; around it.  Once it heats up to room temperature it would release, but in natural low temperatures, it would quickly cool off and re-magnetize. 

I've done enough heavy  thinking for the day.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/4307]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from jerry w]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/4166]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I must have gadolinium in my system, my attraction to women fades away as they approach room temperature. 

Or, it could be their lack of a pulse that makes me want to drift away.

http://boskolives.wordpress.com
]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[TuePMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/4166]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Clumpy]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/4024]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[The room? Why not keep your Gadolinium device in a small chamber, assuming it works the way your unreliable strangers say? You'd have more control over the device's temperature and thereby its function.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[SatAMCDTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/4024]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from TallDave]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3972]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[More detail here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion#Techniques]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCDTE_Rrdrd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3972]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from TallDave]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3970]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[No, you can't create energy this way.  What you've described is essentially the same as the &quot;Free Electricity&quot; scam companies like Sonship have been peddling for decades: power from permanent magnets.  Using gadolinium's properties doesn't really change that.

Essentially, the problem is that the motion from the permanent magnet is not free; they demagnetize after produing a small amount of energy, because magnets are very inefficient storers of energy.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCDTE_Rrdrd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3970]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Angelus]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3949]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I realise i'm sounding like one of my cow-workers here but....

How can a room be just below &quot;room temperature&quot;.  The temperature which the room is curently at makes the current room temperature the &quot;room temperature&quot; variable.  Therefore your room cannot ever be at anything other than at &quot;room temperature&quot;.  Your fridge will be below room temperature say for example 3C but say your whole room was the inside of the fridge then that 3C would be &quot;room temperature&quot;.  Thus making it impossible to have the gadoliniumat anything but at room temperature whilst inside the room.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCDTE_Rrdrd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3949]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from ShChappie]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3932]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I would like to see the comments sorted by  votes descending as the default. 

The mashups ARE pretty good.

Interesting how people react to change.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3932]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from sphilk]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3926]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[well I think this might be relevant and interesting... i decided to do a quick check through google's patent index for the refrigeration motor that you described and guess what i found... your magnetic turbine

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=4468568.PN.&amp;OS=PN/4468568&amp;RS=PN/4468568 

 and there is the patent to prove it. its been around since 1984  but it seems like an interesting and cheaper way to generate power than these non-renewables that we currently use, but i am not an electrical engineer so i could be way off base... but there is your patent Mr Douglas]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3926]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from harryjohnston]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3925]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[There may be another reason why we don't have gadolinium novelty items on our desks; it may be fun, but it's also poisonous. :-)

(According to those same unreliable strangers, that is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadolinium#Precautions)
]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3925]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Real Live Girl]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3922]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Quit feeding me knowledge!  I'm on day 1 of a mini-vacation, and was hoping to give my brain a timeout.  But now because of the curiosity OCD I'm going to be looking up this gadolinium right after this instead of looking up the nearest place I can get a Gin Fizz. Dammit! :)]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3922]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from mulletvampire]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3921]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I suspect you could conquer the &quot;room temperature&quot; issue by building this thing in a large cave... or simply building it underground.

If I remember correctly, caves tend to maintain a remarkably stable temperature year-round... though I'm far too lazy to look it up and confirm.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3921]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from lulu]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3917]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Love your strip today.  I have a friend who is like that woman.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3917]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from dsg]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3913]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Rita Mae,

I have to comment,

IVIL asks --- [i wonder why you went down to 38 comments a day from approx 150?]

Rita responds --- May I suggest that it could that people don't like to be rated?

I think it is the mashups. There are some pretty funny people out there, I actually spend some time reading them. I do look forward to the time when Scott republishes them in a book or online game of some sort, (find the original strip or something like that) and everyone goes crazy demanding royalties or threatening law suits.

dsg

PS: send  me some virtual cake from your retirement party.

]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3913]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from nickersond]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3912]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Okay, Scott.  Enough with the perpetual motion.  It might be fun to think about, but so is invisibility.

BTW, invisibility will soon be possible:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/12/science/12invis.html?_r=1&amp;ex=1182744000&amp;en=5897f9ee231f8457&amp;ei=5070&amp;oref=slogin]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3912]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from thatnerd]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3910]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Scott,

It's fine if you like thinking about things that don't actually work, but some of us like thinking about things that do actually work, and like figuring out why it is that certain ideas won't work.  

You're a trained economist, so you understand.  You feel the need to speak up when someone says they like the idea of a gas tax holiday.  Some of us are like that, with our field of study.  

And your gadolinium idea wouldn't work.  It couldn't generate enough heat, internally, to fully demagnetize, and a fascinating thing would happen as you pulled it away from the magnet: it would cool down.  Exactly as much as it heated up in bringing it close to the magnet.  

Wacky, no?  

Basically, you're on firmer ground in terms of thinking this would make a nifty refrigerator, based on the rule that it heats when placed in contact with a magnet and cools when removed from contact.  You put a fan on the magnet to blow away the heat (through convection) when it's in contact with the magnet, cooling it back down to room temperature.  Then, you pull it away and quickly place it in contact with your refrigeration chamber.  Your magnet absorbs a little heat from the refrigerator, warms up a little, and you place it back in contact with the magnet and fan.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3910]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from argenbert]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3905]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[scott, you blogged about this! you totally saw that coming

http://digg.com/gadgets/Latest_iPhone_2_0_beta_adds_geo_tagging_to_Camera_photos]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3905]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from rita mae]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3903]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[IVIL asks --- [i wonder why you went down to 38 comments a day from approx 150?]

May I suggest that it could that people don't like to be rated?

SLAP D MONKEY  =   -3
MUELLAND  =   -3
MALICIANT  =   -3
BRAD K.  =  -3
ARBYISME  =  -3

Why?  Their posts had nothing in them that would warrant a minus.  Who the hell decides that these individuals should get a minus at all?  But then, every time I have posted since this change, I don't remember getting a plus.  Everything has been minus.  Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean that Scott didn't think  this up to get rid of some of us.  I say PENIS to you, Scott.  When I wrote the f-bomb the other day, it came out as all apostrophes and pound signs, anyway.    PENIS came out as PENIS, but then PENIS always does, doesn't it?  So PENIS is alright, but !$%* isn't?   Okay, I give.  I will stop posting and just ride off into the sunset as it seems everyone would like.  PENIS   PENIS   PENIS.  There have that.

Rita Mae

]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuAMCDTE_Rndnd]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/3903]]></guid>
</item>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedPMCSTE_Rstst]]></pubDate>
<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[WedPMCSTE_Rstst]]></lastBuildDate></channel></rss>
