<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Comments for entry "The Shirtless FBI Guy" at Dilbert.com Blog]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/857]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Regular thoughts and updates from Dilbert.com]]></description>
<language><![CDATA[en-us]]></language>
<generator><![CDATA[VPI.Net MyBlogAbout]]></generator>
<managingEditor><![CDATA[]]></managingEditor>
<webMaster><![CDATA[]]></webMaster>
<ttl><![CDATA[5]]></ttl>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from iuweiiodjnkl]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1909268]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi buddy : 

HOT SELL Product Brand is below:  ==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====
,nike shoes,air jordan shoes,nike s h o x shoes,gucci shoes ,true religion jeans, ed hardy jeans,coogi jeans,affliction
jeans, Laguna Beach Jeans,ed hardy T-shirts,Coogi T-shirts,Christian Audigier T-shirts,Gucci T-shirts,Polo T-shirts,coach
handbag,gucci handbag,prada handbag,chanel handbag .
free shipping 
New to Hong Kong : Winter Dress
New era cap $9
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike s h o x(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $33
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18
Come back tomorrow for another Daily Dose of Style! Bookmark this page &gt;&gt; 
give you the unexpected harvest

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.scnshop.com ) =====

Recommended today Nike:

Name: LeBron 9.5-2

http://www.fullmalls.com/views.asp?hw_id=13118&amp;class_id=17&amp;sort_id=66&amp;nsort_id=411


]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[SatPMCSTE_Rstst]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1909268]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from zhanba33]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1901542]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Hello, everybody, the good shoping place, the new season approaching, click in. 
Welcome to , variety, low price and good quality, and the sales price
is low , Move your mouse to work shopping! Hey hey Believe you will love it.
 Welcome to ====  http://www.luckygrip.com ==
Jewelry wholesale, custom-made samples
Air Jordan (1-24) shoes $35
Nike shox (R4, NZ, OZ, TL1, TL2, TL3) $35
Handbags ( Coach Lv fendi D&amp;G) $30
T-shirts (polo, ed hardy, lacoste) $14
Jean (True Religion, ed hardy, coogi)$34
Sunglasses ( Oakey, coach, Gucci, Armaini)$15
New era cap $9
Biki ni (Ed hardy, polo) $18  
FREE SHIPPING
 http://www.luckygrip.com 

 http://www.luckygrip.com 

  http://www.luckygrip.com 

 http://www.luckygrip.com 
 http://www.luckygrip.com 

 http://www.luckygrip.com 

  http://www.luckygrip.com 

 http://www.luckygrip.com]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[SunPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1901542]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from rsjosdf]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1892978]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[
Hi buddy : 

in order to thank everyone, characteristic, novel style, varieties, low price and good quality, and the low sale price. Thank everyone

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL 2,TL3) $35

Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35

Tshirts (ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

Sunglasses(Oakey, coach,gucci,Armaini) $16

New era cap $15

Bikini (Ed hardy) $25


==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com ) =====

==== ( http://www.scnshop.com ) =====

]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[TuePMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1892978]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from aplarue]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1890531]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Here's another case of facts getting in the way regarding USC coach Lane Kiffin. 

http://deadspin.com/5961555/why-does-everyone-care-which-exit-lane-kiffin-used-when-he-left-the-visitors-locker-room-last-night?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&amp;utm_source=deadspin_twitter&amp;utm_medium=socialflow]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[MonAMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1890531]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from webgrunt]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1888306]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[&quot;do you trust the free press whose mission is to bring you accurate and useful news&quot;

Wow, that has to be the most naive statement I've ever seen.  Or it may tie with others, but I'm certain that nothing surpasses it.  I'm also certain it's intentionally naive.  There's no way at all Scott could be so deceived.

The free press is a business.  Their mission is to make money.  They twist events whatever way necessary to make money from reporting them.  

The people who work in it have personal viewpoints and biases, and they add their own slants to everything.  By the time most stories get to us, they bear little resemblance to what actually happened.  I have first-hand examples of this and have second-hand reports from trusted friends who have also been present at events which were reported on in the press, and the results are laughable.  

Of course, the free press doesn't even come close to twisting reality like a police report...]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[SatPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1888306]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from ceprn69]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1888270]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[&quot;Or do you trust the free press whose mission is to bring you accurate and useful news?&quot;

This is ironic considering the mission of Faux Noize.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[SatPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1888270]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from asparaguspee]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1886466]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Slightly off-topic, but within the scope of recent posts, a must-read Onion article: 

Nation Horrified To Learn About War In Afghanistan While Reading Up On Petraeus Sex Scandal

http://www.theonion.com/articles/nation-horrified-to-learn-about-war-in-afghanistan,30367/

]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1886466]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from chuck.milner]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1886389]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I don't give the free press any credit on this one. They have not turned &quot;a bunch of nothing into two stories&quot;.

What they have done is completely ignore the story about how Patraeus no longer has to testify about CIA involvement during the attack in Benghazi. You'd think it might be important to hear what the head of the CIA has to say about the assassination of an ambassador.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1886389]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from EMU]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1886256]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[tabmok99:
Thanks for sharing the link. You'e absolutely right.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1886256]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from tabmok99]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1886232]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[The photo has been posted at Fox News.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/14/fbi-agent-under-review-for-conduct-in-petraeus-scandal-is-counterterrorism/

The joke here is obvious, the FBI agent looks exactly like one of the dummies.  It's like he's one of them.  I understand media sensationalism going out of control, but this is a bit over the top.  It's pretty obvious to anyone with a half a brain cell that there was nothing to this story from the get-go.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1886232]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from anothermick]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885820]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I hypothesize that you are sensitive to the decontextualization of so-called news because you get taken out of context and subjected to a good straw-man butt kicking occasionally.  
  i actually found your blog thanks to a news outlet posting you out of context a while back.  crappy for you, pathetic of them, entertaining for me...  i'm gonna say that i would rather it not happen, but its a bit of a tossup.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885820]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from socratesofathens]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885782]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[You can see the FBI agent's firing-range picture here:

http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2019684905_agent15m.html]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[FriAMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885782]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from LLLVIS]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885574]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Well, a little late to the party, but at least I'm here!

News sources have to sell news. Selling news is like photoshopping pictures - someone is always going to make alterations in a desire to make their version more marketable. 

I think this is also why many History-type programs are so popular, because we learn more about !$%*!$%*!$%*! around a famous story than we did before...for either good or bad. 

It also think this is evident in our taste, or lack of, in television shows. We apparently can't have shows just 'about' something, there has to be fake interpersonal drama in there as well, all for the sake of ratings. And ratings=$$. Unfortunately.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885574]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Kingdinosaur]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885538]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[So the guy was shirtless between two firing dummies?


I do not get law-enforcement humor.  I get guns and gun humor.  I get nudity based humor.  This is just odd.  


Hold on a minute...  can we now say FBI Agent backtracks from nude pics or FBI agent doubles down on topless photos?  This looks like it can go either way.  He might actually have the worse lawyer ever on his side.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885538]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Phantom II]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885536]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[What this shows more than anything is that what passes for journalism today no longer has any standards.  They never feel the need to report the truth, or check the facts in the story before pushing it out as fast as possible. In their rush to try to resurrect their dying ratings, they go for sensationalism over substance, regardless of who gets hurt or how biased or incorrect their story is.

That's why I never form an opinion about something I hear in the news, particularly when it's salacious or controversial, until time and public outcry forces so-called journalists to finally do their duty and discover what the late Paul Harvey called &quot;The rest of the story.&quot;

I recall an earlier post of Scott's concerning the Trayvon Martin case, and how biased and templatized the initial reports on that story were.  &quot;White guy guns down poor innocent black child.&quot;  I mentioned at that time that I had not formed an opinion because there was too much rush to put a horrible story on the news regardless of the facts. Now we know that the narrative the press initially pushed, complete with tampered audio and incorrect video analysis, was almost completely wrong.  

This story (the shirtless Special Agent) is much the same.  All the news media ran with the story of this crazed stalker FBI agent doing an Anthony Wiener on some wacko socialite in Tampa.  &quot;So let me get this straight,&quot; I thought.  &quot;The FBI guy who starts out investigating harassing emails to a woman turns right around and sends her harassing emails of his own.  Sure, makes sense to me!  NOT!!&quot;

Now we find out that he's an FBI hero who was responsible, at least in part, for stopping the terrorist who planned to blow up the Space Needle in Washington state on New Year's Eve a number of years ago. Yeah, if ever the press was justified in slamming the reputation of any FBI guy, he'ds sure be the one I'd pick.

The mainstream media is no longer concerned with reporting the news, or holding power accountable.  They're there for two things: to push an agenda, and to try to drive up ratings by focusing on sex, gore and character assassination.  Anyone who pays attention to them and allows their opinions to form before the whole story comes out is going to stay ignorant forever.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885536]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from daveywest]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885534]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Families that send topless shirts to each other aren't joking, they are swingers.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885534]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from Dingbat]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885530]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[This might be funny if the consequences of this whole debacle were not so dire. 

Imagine Dilbert's firm had actually (either inadvertently or in a moment of competence inspired by some existential threat) hired good leaders who began to turn the company around, listen to customers, produce useful, high-quailty products, create good jobs, etc. 

The PHB is reassigned  to lead some useless department where he can't do any harm. Years of destructive mismanagement characterized by incalculable opportunity loss looks to be coming to an end. 

Then the someone nails the good leader for using company-provided office supplies for personal use. Scandal erupts. Good leaders are fired. The PHB is back in charge and what might have been is lost forever. 

That's pretty much what happened here. Competent leaders emerged out of necessity in Iraq -and were actually promoted over career-plodding generals whose failures were rewarded, more often than not, with praise and promotion. We had a chance for a decade perhaps of decent leaders in the CIA and military. Who knows where it could have gone from there - and now this. 

It makes me ill - because in this case, incompetence costs far more than poor shareholder returns....]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885530]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from whtllnew]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885507]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[@usmdj

[What suprises me is that people are still suprised when the commercial media manipulates stories to create sensationalism. ]

Theres a sucker born every minute.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885507]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from meblackstone]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885506]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[I can't blame the media, as they are for profit and doing what gets them profit.

The key to a quality media is that it be unrestricted while simultaneously non-profit (as an organization. Pay still needs to be high enough to attract quality individuals), so the stupidity of the public doesn't influence what's shown. Unfortunately, those two are almost mutually exclusive.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885506]]></guid>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comment  from usmdj]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885496]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[What suprises me is that people are still suprised when the commercial media manipulates stories to create sensationalism.  

THEY ARE IN THE BUSINESS OF MAKING MONEY.  Not reporting the news accurately.]]></description>
<pubDate><![CDATA[ThuPMCSTE_Rthth]]></pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/1885496]]></guid>
</item>
<pubDate><![CDATA[WedPMCSTE_Rstst]]></pubDate>
<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[WedPMCSTE_Rstst]]></lastBuildDate></channel></rss>
