Home
 The problem with being a tyrannical dictator is that there is no career path and no practical way to retire. If another dictator takes over, the first item on his agenda is turning your head into a bird feeder for his guest house. If democracy breaks out, sooner or later the mob will want to execute you for crimes against humanity. As a tyrant, your only rational strategy is continued brutal suppression of your peeps. That's a lot of work for the tyrant, and no fun for the peeps.

What the world needs is a program that allows graceful retirement for tyrants, so they have some incentive to step aside. Justice would never be served, but it would be best for the country.

I imagine the tyrant retirement program would provide some sort of international security guarantees and permanent amnesty for the tyrant. That might require some U.N. forces to guard his mansion or island fortress or wherever he decides to retire. And he would have unrestricted travel rights, in case he wanted to get out of the country for his own safety.

Second, the tyrant would be written into the history books as some sort of founding father type. He would be, ironically, the father of democracy, having stepped aside to allow it to happen. The history books would be modified to show the tyrant did many good things in terms of national stability, and then stepped aside to allow democracy to flourish. His multiple genocides would be downplayed. No tyrant wants to get bad press after retiring.

The tyrant would also be allowed to keep much of the money he stole, say up to a limit of $5 billion per tyrant. That's enough to keep him in helicopters and hookers.

You could add some extras, such as putting the tyrant on stamps and currency, or agreeing to keep him on the ones already in circulation. The point is that retirement has to look like a safe and honorable thing.

The story line for the country would be that while a dictatorship made sense while the tyrant was in power, it only worked because of the force of his amazing personality. And since his country couldn't be expected to find another dictator of such compassion and skill, democracy is the best succession strategy. That spin might sound preposterous, but when you consider the things your own government tells you, it's not that different.

I know it will never work. But waiting for tyrants to die takes too long, and killing them is too expensive. There has to be a better way.

 
Rank Up Rank Down Votes:  +45
  • Print
  • Share

Comments

Sort By:
May 28, 2008
The problem is the tyrant retiring will create a power vacuum. He could say he's stepping aside to let democracy move in, but there will always be someone with similar aspirations to the tyrant (probably someone in his government or close to him) that will want to take control as soon as he leaves. If you were the second in command, would you let democracy move in when you were pretty much set up to be the next ruler yourself. The tyrant would have to get the democracy train moving before he retired and hope that nobody in his own regime kills him before he retires. That's a pretty heavy risk. Worst case, there are several people that want to be the next tyrant and civil war breaks out, which will only hurt the innocent. So the retirement of the dictator would require the retirement of most or all of his flunkies.

--KurtRoedeger
 
 
-6 Rank Up Rank Down
May 28, 2008
Q: how many madates could I .. i mean A TYRANT stay for? and whold i ..DOH! A TYRANT be able to stepp aside and then later on get back up on the horse so to say?
 
 
+4 Rank Up Rank Down
May 28, 2008
Hi Scott,

I like this idea. But it does have a problem. With a retirement package like that, I am considering a career as a dictator. Know of any current openings anywhere? Preferably a warm island nation with good fishing.

Keep me posted of any vacancies,

dsg
 
 
 
Get the new Dilbert app!
Old Dilbert Blog