Home
Every time I see a news story about early humans mating with Neanderthals or other near-monkey species, I wonder if there were any species that our ancestors didn't try to have sex with. And how did the conversation go just prior to the first pre-human deciding to get some Neanderthal action?

Pre-human 1: "Hey, that creature by the watering hole has two legs. I'd totally do it."

Pre-human 2: "It's all yours. I've got my eye on a tiny horse with a limp."

I'm no Darwin, but I have a few observations of my own. My first observation is that the only species that have survived to modern times are the ones able to fend off unwanted advances from horny pre-humans. Take the giraffe, for example. Its long legs keep its naughty bits well above the pelvic thrusting level of our ancestors. Then you have your cheetahs that can outrun us, your fish that can hide underwater, your birds that can fly away, your zebras that can kick, and so on. But the poor Neanderthals and other slow-moving bipeds all got banged out of existence by our horny ancestors.

I have a hypothesis that several million years ago just about anything could mate and have offspring with anything else. For example, the modern beaver is probably the offspring of an early human and a bear that was slow to snap out of hibernation. That's just a guess. But the next time you see a beaver standing on his back legs eating a fish, try to imagine him as a buck-toothed tourist at a sushi place. It's easier than it should be.

Contrast the open-minded attitude of our ancestors to our picky modern selves. Now humans won't even date someone who cheers for the wrong sports team or goes to the wrong church. And we don't want our mates to be sporting any hair below the chin. Dating outside your species is totally frowned upon. I think maybe we've lost something. On the plus side, your dog appreciates your willingness to have a platonic relationship. But he still gets nervous when you give him a bath. There's a lot of bad history there.
 
Rank Up Rank Down Votes:  +150
  • Print
  • Share
  • Share:

Comments

Sort By:
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 28, 2011
This is still the case in my country (Italy) where every live organism who comes in proximity EVEN OF OUR FIRST MINISTER, risks getting banged!

(fortunately, being my connationals on average 1m 60 cm tall (sorry, I dont know how many ft and inches is that...) other more civilized people do not get any big risk...)

 
 
-1 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 23, 2011
The thing I like best about this topic is that the amazingly stupid spam filter is seemingly unable to pick up on the following words:

sex, larger-breasted, penises

(See Raskolnikov's comment.)
 
 
Sep 22, 2011
I think some of the problems with the Crog-Mag/Neandrathal science is that there is no explanation where the Neandrathal went. Could they all just go extinct? Could they all really evolve by mating outside their species and no one mating just with other Neandrathals? If they were so prevalent we should still see evidence of them today.

To much of this information is based on theory - not scientific fact. A fact is something that can be scientifically reproduced (like gravity). Instead we have many academic theories, many of which are incompatible, that continually build on one another always assuming the one below is rock solid fact while ignoring eviddence to the contrary.
If someone tells me Scott Adams has a dog. Then later they say Scott Agams likes dogs. Can I build on that and come to the conclusion that Scott Adams likes to have sex with dogs? This is how much of this science goes in that conclusions are reached based off other's evidence and predisposed ideas. It's always assumed that other's research is correct because that is the easy thinng to do.
 
 
Sep 19, 2011
There is no evidence that modern humans are more intelligent than Neanderthals, other than that humans lived and Neanderthals did not. But the obvious, undisputed difference between moderns and Neanderthals can already account for that. Homo sapiens is physically a wimpy, stripped-down Neanderthal. This means we need less food, and can reproduce faster in a given area. Humans are just cheap knock-offs of Neanderthals.

Neanderthal brains were the same size as the brains of modern humans. In case you were wondering.
 
 
Sep 16, 2011
I actually find it quite a good reference that you taught your dog to sniff your behind! It shows talent AND originality on your part! Besides that, let's see ANY of the current members of the Congress OR the Senate do THAT! Huh? Yeah! Huh?
 
 
Sep 16, 2011
I actually find it quite a good reference that you taught your dog to sniff your behind! It shows talent AND originality on your part! Besides that, let's see ANY of the current members of the Congress OR the Senate do THAT! Huh? Yeah! Huh?
 
 
Sep 15, 2011
Those weren't the times.
 
 
Sep 15, 2011
Only you would come up with a new "On the Origin of Species" based on the premise that if a human can have sex with it, it becomes extinct.

One obvious flaw in the theory: why didn't we become extinct when we had sex with each other?

Your mind never ceases to amaze me. That's not always a good thing.
 
 
Sep 15, 2011
@Agnello:
"...a Neanderthal male could easily overpower and mate with a Cro-Magnon female, destroying any overprotective Cro-Magnon males that took exception to his intentions."

I disagree to a certain extent to this hypothesis. I can envision a scenario where a Cro-Magnon female is raised near Neanderthals, and where this Cro-Magnon female is able to hear and grow accustomed to their primitive music, and where she's able to watch them dance and possibly even get a glimpse of their longer, thicker penises, and would develop a curiosity and an intent to experiment.

Conversely, a motivated, estrous female Neanderthal could certainly experiment in the other direction. Say she was at the watering hole and saw a blond, blue-eyed Cro-Magnon male with a spear, a knife or some intricately fashioned seashell jewelry. If she's interested in smart children, she might jump him from behind and force him to engage in some kind of female-dominant sex position?

Or the interspecies sex might be more organized, where seashell jewelry is purposefully traded with the larger-breasted Neanderthal ladies. Once the act is finished and the jewelry changes hands, who's to say a Neanderthal male wearing some kind of a fox robe and large feather hat wouldn't come out of the bushes, !$%*!$%*!$ the female and take 90% of the jewelry? We don't know. The fossil record is incomplete.
 
 
Sep 15, 2011
Amid all these intelligent and eloquent comments, I cannot shake an image out of my head: Sharon Stone eating sashimi.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 15, 2011
Scott,
The relative uniformity of Homo Sapiens' mitochondrian DNA, which another commentator has already noted here, suggest that the transfer of genetic material went in the opposite direction from that which you imply - that is,a Neanderthal male could easily over power and mate with a Cro-Magnon female, destroying any overprotective Cro-Magnon males that took exception to his intentions.A Neanderthal might conceivably do this if a stronger Neanderthal female was unavailable, or simply unattainable.Alternatively, mating with any available (that is, local and functionally undefended) hominid female may have been an over riding instinct.
The idea that a Cro-Magnon male could have successfully mated with a Neanderthal female,though, is unlikely in the extreme, and even were he successful in doing so, the resulting genetic line would have wiped out when Cro-Magnon's superior ability to communicate and cooperate finally overcame the individually massively superior Neanderthal's claim on the resources and geography of Europe.
As far as xenophilia - the inter-fertility of the two populations would seem to demonstrate that they were of the same species...at least, the offspring of these couplings were themselves fertile within at least one of the parent populations, unlike more distant cross breeds (Ligers,mules).
-Agnello
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 15, 2011
I have just studied my family photographs carefully from the 18th century to date. All okay so far.
 
 
+6 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 15, 2011
@AtlantaDude:
Best guess is that while other animals developed the ability to run, sheep gained the ability to not care. Think about it: Humans would keep them around, make sure they got enough to eat, ad all they had to deal with was some ocasional sodomy and sticky wool.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 15, 2011
Most women are thinking, "Yeah, that Pre-human #1 sounds exactly like a guy I dated..."
 
 
-2 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 15, 2011
I wouldn't say Humans are picky. You only need to look at the wide variety of sex-related websites. People are banging other people of all ages, races, and even religions. People are sticking it to toys -- some erotic, some stuffed -- and even some so life-like you have to ask, "Can I try to?"

But not for $7000/copy.

People are doing it with beasts that have 4 legs, or no legs at all. Zoo love? Hello? Nasty, and repulsive to say the least. I won't even acknowledge it. But, these sites stay in business, so someone is obviously watching what our ancestors probably thought was somewhat normal.

As for myself, I prefer the straight-up hetero action. But thinking of how our ancestors were literally into "free love", I was reminded today of how we in this modern age are restricted in the type of love we want, but know we will never have. Allow me to sum it up thus: Beautiful Women...and Sport.

To put it more simply: the Lingerie Football League.

Check it out. Our caveman ancestors never had it so good...
 
 
+8 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 15, 2011
You forgot the warning. Uh oh.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 14, 2011
Nice work there Scott. Now I'm trying to work out what group copulation caused the Kangaroo.

For proof of inherent randiness, look up the vid on youtube with the chimp and the frog.
 
 
+9 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 14, 2011
While some dogs may be happy with the 'new rules', I know a few dogs who can't be deterred from trying to start things up again...
 
 
Sep 14, 2011
How do you explain the ongoing existence of sheep?

My totally non-scientific theory is that bears had some influence on the creation of humans. When you look at some people, they are clearly more bear than monkey.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Sep 14, 2011
Beavers are vegetarians and also like wood but they will eat some already dead fish. To be safe keep your wood away from any beaver eating fish since your wood will get a dead fish smell.

Perverse beaver lesson is now over...
 
 
 
Get the new Dilbert app!
Old Dilbert Blog