STRIP FOR Jan 24, 1992

Previous
January 24, 1992
Next
close COPY TO CLIPBOARD

Comments

Sort By:
User Name: Infiltrator May 9, 2009
+2 Rank Up Rank Down
Well, actually, he should've been allowed to continue. There's no way they could prove he had any insider information. All he has to say is that he was at his house the whole time. Prosecution would have a hell of a time trying to prove his super-hearing.
 
 
User Name: IMAPHB Feb 17, 2009
+2 Rank Up Rank Down
Well, technically he isn't guilty of insider trading, since neither does he have fiduciary duty to the public nor is he an insider by SEC definition. So, I suppose justice prevails in this case.
 
 
 

Dilbert 2.0 - 20 years of Dilbert