Sort By:
Jan 15, 2014
It definitely seems like Dilbert is an "accessory to murder" here. Not a very fashionable one, of course.
+16 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 4, 2010
Oh. Mongobert not think that. Mongobert just think he guilty of being projectile. That what Mongobert get for not being lawyer.
Apr 6, 2010
Technically Dilbert has killed nobody, not on purpose anyway.

1. He never touched his co-worker, only informed him of the plot to kill him.

2. Although it was Dilbert that physically killed the rebel leader it was not his intention and was planned by the other Elbonians. so he is only guilty of manslaughter or at most accessory to murder...
+31 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 2, 2008
Well, well. This is two people that Dilbert has killed in a week. I suppose the proper response should be, "This can't be good." But somehow it's quite enjoyably entertaining.
Get the new Dilbert app!