STRIP FOR May 16, 2008
Comments
User Name: ada42
May 28, 2008
0
To: TheNewSiteSux
As a side comment, there is http://dilbert.com/fast which doesn't use the annoying new interface. However even here annoyance can not be avoided, as the images are smaller (related to the fast part, I am sure) and sometimes the lettering is not as clear as the "full" size.
As a side comment, there is http://dilbert.com/fast which doesn't use the annoying new interface. However even here annoyance can not be avoided, as the images are smaller (related to the fast part, I am sure) and sometimes the lettering is not as clear as the "full" size.
User Name: big11ja
May 22, 2008
+1
Strip is fine, but your new format would itself make a great Dilbert strip. "Our new web format is so fast that people don't have time to read it." "Is that good?" "It's more than good, it's cutting-edge." "My eyes hurt."
User Name: TheNewSiteSux
May 16, 2008
-3
I am only signing up for this site to add my voice to those who say how HORRIBLE the new design is.
Hard to navigate, slow to load, and will taking away the ability to save strips really slow down ANYONE who knows about screen capture?
I used to visit the site once a month and spend an hour or so catching up on all the strips.
I doubt this site will see me again.
Bye!
Hard to navigate, slow to load, and will taking away the ability to save strips really slow down ANYONE who knows about screen capture?
I used to visit the site once a month and spend an hour or so catching up on all the strips.
I doubt this site will see me again.
Bye!
User Name: MyPC8MyBrain
May 16, 2008
-1
I just wanted to add a comment that wasn't some silly attempt at proving who is better at english.
Who cares ?
My comment:
I really hate her hair.
It makes me shudder to think what she would look like naked with that hair style
Who cares ?
My comment:
I really hate her hair.
It makes me shudder to think what she would look like naked with that hair style
User Name: NeilRickards
May 16, 2008
-3
stouffvillian - I like the "[not one]" parsing argument. But by binding that tight, the sentence reads "one of you is not reliable, two of you are". Not the usual understanding
Tallpawn - dictionary.com conclusively backs you up. I don't like the semantics, but 1200 years of usage makes complaining pretty pointless. Objection withdrawn :)
Tallpawn - dictionary.com conclusively backs you up. I don't like the semantics, but 1200 years of usage makes complaining pretty pointless. Objection withdrawn :)
OR
TO SAVE YOUR
FAVORITE STRIPS
