Strips
Reddit
MySpace
Google
Ask
del.icio.us
Slashdot
Twitter
Facebook
Yahoo Bookmarks
Yahoo Web
Digg
Technorati
close
close
COPY TO CLIPBOARD
Comments
+7
Mar 26, 2012
In the light of Wally's comment, it's clear that he has absolutely no intention of working on any of this....
-19
Mar 26, 2012
Dilbert's a jerk! A comet would likely eliminate all life on earth. Why couldn't he just wish for a meteor? Jerk!
+17
Mar 25, 2012
The comet is a reference to other SA works. And a timely reminder too, you can never watch out too hard for comets striking oil.
+63
Mar 25, 2012
Do not listen and - above all - do not respond to stupid. It's like slap-fighting a cream cake: it gets all over you.
+11
Mar 25, 2012
kevinmoorerules>> 1: Man misunderstands statement
>> due to simple mishearing of one word
May happen, sure..
>> 2: Instead of simply clearing up the
>> misunderstanding, the speaker has a
>> breakdown. This seems a rather irrational
>> response when it surely would be much simpler
>> and easier to just restate the initial statement,
>> with emphasis on the misheard word.
The clearing is Dilberts "Well, I didn't"
>> This would surely clear up the misunderstanding.
It didn't.
>> No need to have a mental breakdown because
>> someone misheard you.
You didn't experience meetings like this, am I right?
If a guy misheard you on a metting like this, in a way like this, the answer should be some heavy arguing about this guys intention. The ladylike answer of Alice would be the "fist of death". But being Dilbert, a nervous breakdown seems to be the right way to (not) handle this
