Shady practices are shady practices irrelevant who is done for. I agree that the company is AFM (Anything for Money) but that doesn't mean that Dilbert himself should be corrupt.
Dilbert was not concern on the shady practice, but who it was for. Meaning Dilbert had no problem doing the virus, if it was for our government. This in turn means that Dilbert himself is not above corruption.
Is like the people that see nothing wrong with Obama pushing to start WW3, and helping Alcaeda overthrown governments (First Lybia, and now Syria), but where arguing about George Bush Weapons of Mass Deception and the war on Iraq.
Corrupt practices are corrupt practices irrelevant of who does it.
Evil is evil, irrelevant who does it.
Always wondered what those guys in Elbonia were up to. Tough to attack missiles that are launched from a trebuchet (spelling?) - telling Loud Howard to put a sock in it probably wouldn't work very well, but the living room couch might be the ticket...